- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:47:01 -0500
- To: "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>
- CC: "UA List (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
"Hansen, Eric" wrote: > > I can see what you are saying, but it sort of begs the question, "If it is > so 'important' and 'special', why isn't it _at least_ as important (in terms > of priority) as the checkpoint of which it is a special case?" > > I tend to think of a special case as a 'subset' or a closer look at > something and that an 'important' special case would be at least as > important in terms of 'priority'..... > > Maybe we should say that checkpoint 9.6 (P3) is an "_unimportant_ special > case" of checkpoint 9.3 (P2)....!? Or just "special case" - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 16:48:57 UTC