- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:08:56 -0500 (EST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Sure.
My comment is editorial - it was the word that confused me, but the idea was
fine. So I trust you guys to do a fine editorial job (otherwise I can always
scream at you Ian - I'll be passing your house in a couple of days...)
Cheers
Charles
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote:
What about this version:
Many speech synthesizers allow users to select
from among preset options that control different
voice parameters (gender, pitch range, stress,
richnes, etc.) as a group.
When using these synthesizers, make available
the full range of preset options (e.g., "adult male
voice", "female child voice", "robot voice", etc.).
- Ian
Jon Gunderson wrote:
>
> Charles,
> What happens is that the user agent can enumerate a number of voice labels
> that are typically made available to users as a list of voice
> options. Each voice label has its own pitch range and other voice filter
> parameters that determine the "sound" and "accent" of the voice (i.e adult
> male, child female, robotic...). Usually features like average pitch and
> speech rate can be adjusted within a voice label, but the other voice
> filtering parameters like pitch range, stress and richness cannot be
> adjusted within the label. Therefore the voice label confounds these later
> voice filter parameters since they cannot be adjusted manually, and
> typically if you allow the user to adjust these filters manually they can
> easily set filter parameters that result in unstable speech filters (i.e.
> noise rather than speech is generated). But I would leave it to the
> editors to find the right words.
>
> Jon
>
> At 10:12 AM 11/23/2000 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> >Confound means to me that they make it very difficult. Do you mean compound
> >or combine?
> >
> >If so, this makes good sense to me.
> >
> >cheers
> >
> >Chaals
> >
> >On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jon Gunderson wrote:
> >
> > I suggest that we do not change checkpoint 4.14 (other than for other
> > resolved changes for adding language), but add the following note after the
> > checkpoint.
> >
> > [NEW]
> > Note: Many speech synthesizers confound the specification of voice gender,
> > pitch range, stress, richness in named voice labels that use pitch range,
> > stress and richness parameters to help create different voice sounds (i.e
> > adult male, child female, robot voice). When using these synthesizers make
> > available the full range of voices.
> > [/NEW]
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
until 6 January 2001 at:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2001 14:08:58 UTC