- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:08:56 -0500 (EST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Sure. My comment is editorial - it was the word that confused me, but the idea was fine. So I trust you guys to do a fine editorial job (otherwise I can always scream at you Ian - I'll be passing your house in a couple of days...) Cheers Charles On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote: What about this version: Many speech synthesizers allow users to select from among preset options that control different voice parameters (gender, pitch range, stress, richnes, etc.) as a group. When using these synthesizers, make available the full range of preset options (e.g., "adult male voice", "female child voice", "robot voice", etc.). - Ian Jon Gunderson wrote: > > Charles, > What happens is that the user agent can enumerate a number of voice labels > that are typically made available to users as a list of voice > options. Each voice label has its own pitch range and other voice filter > parameters that determine the "sound" and "accent" of the voice (i.e adult > male, child female, robotic...). Usually features like average pitch and > speech rate can be adjusted within a voice label, but the other voice > filtering parameters like pitch range, stress and richness cannot be > adjusted within the label. Therefore the voice label confounds these later > voice filter parameters since they cannot be adjusted manually, and > typically if you allow the user to adjust these filters manually they can > easily set filter parameters that result in unstable speech filters (i.e. > noise rather than speech is generated). But I would leave it to the > editors to find the right words. > > Jon > > At 10:12 AM 11/23/2000 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >Confound means to me that they make it very difficult. Do you mean compound > >or combine? > > > >If so, this makes good sense to me. > > > >cheers > > > >Chaals > > > >On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jon Gunderson wrote: > > > > I suggest that we do not change checkpoint 4.14 (other than for other > > resolved changes for adding language), but add the following note after the > > checkpoint. > > > > [NEW] > > Note: Many speech synthesizers confound the specification of voice gender, > > pitch range, stress, richness in named voice labels that use pitch range, > > stress and richness parameters to help create different voice sounds (i.e > > adult male, child female, robot voice). When using these synthesizers make > > available the full range of voices. > > [/NEW] -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2001 14:08:58 UTC