- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:38:35 -0500
- To: duerst@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, clilley@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Martin, I am not sure I would like a standard based on pixels, since this seems too connected to the hardware which is typically not under the control of the user agent developer. Although a user agent developer could probably calculate this information. I would like to see something more in the lines of point sizes, like 9 points as a minimum. Does the concept of point size translate to other languages? What terminology do non-Latin based languages use to indicate the size of their characters when rendered by a compuer? Thanks for your help, Jon At 03:49 PM 5/21/2001 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote: >Hello Ian, > >Just a few thoughts: > >- There is two issues of resolution, namely a) the screen resolution > (in pixels) and b) the visual resolution (in terms of optical frequency > per degree angle measured from they eye. > > For a), certain scripts may need more pixels for character height > (or width) than others. As the Latin script is rather at the lower > end (for upper-case only, a height of 5 pixels is enough), you won't > get i18n problems, I guess (e.g. if the details for your checkpoint > say: "...control...size...of text down to at least 5 pixels...", > then that won't make it impossible for other scripts to get to their > smallest feasible size). In other words, a tight (i.e. as high as > possible) lower bound requirement can differ for different scripts, > but you can just take the minimum, and the minimum for Latin is a > good overall minimum. > > b) is more difficult, because the UA software doesn't really control it. > >- Being able to increase the reference size of rendered text can also be > an I18N issue, as for some scripts, you really want to make the reference > size larger. > >- The hight should be the overall hight, not the x-height. The aspect > ratio doesn't have anything to do with it as far as I understand. > >- Please note that there are programs (mostly layout software such > as pagemaker,...) that show a line of text below a certain size as > a grey strip. This is called 'greek text' (as always, typographers > use strange terms :-). This can be quite helpful to get an overview > of a large page, less disturbing that actual text that is too small > to be read, but I'm not sure it's an accessibility issue. > > >Regards, Martin. > > >At 11:21 01/05/18 -0400, Ian Jacobs wrote: >>Chris, Martin, >> >>The UAWG would like your input on a question of visual text >>rendering and internationalization. Checkpoint 4.1 of the 9 April >>2001 draft [1] starts: >> >> "4.1 Allow global configuration and control over the reference >> size of rendered text ..." >> >>This is a Priority 1 checkpoint. One reviewer pointed out that it >>is not really a P1 requirement to allow the user to choose very >>small text sizes. Indeed, the intention of this checkpoint is >>primarily to allow users with low vision to increase text >>size. [I would note here that small text is useful to some users >>(e.g., so that users with screen readers can scroll less), but >>that's not a P1 requirement.] >> >>At our teleconference yesterday we asked ourselves whether we >>could come up with some lower bound on the requirement. Thus, >>user agents would not be required to provide access to very >>small text size as part of meeting this checkpoint (or, >>for example, they might allow configuration, but not >>actually be required to render very small text). >> >>Our questions are thus: >> >> - How might we express a lower bound in text size? >> What units would we use? What parameter to measure >> size (x-height? aspect ratio?)? >> >> - What internationalization issues enter into this >> discussion? Does a lower bound requirement >> make sense across different scripts? >> >>Thank you for your help on this topic, >> >> - Ian >> >>Note to the Working Group: For checkpoints 4.1 and 4.2, we should >>change "rendered text" to "visually rendered text" to be more >>precise. >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-UAAG10-20010409/ >>[2] http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc3.html#512 >> >>-- >>Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >>Tel: +1 831 457-2842 >>Cell: +1 917 450-8783 Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 09:38:00 UTC