- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:10:40 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Al Gilman wrote: > > Checkpoint 8.4 > > Where it says in the note > > ... This checkpoint does not require that > the outline view be navigable, but this is recommended; refer > to [456]checkpoint 7.6. > > This appears to be legacy language left over from before the > changes in 7.6 and 7.7. It is quite unclear as it stands, > in that checkpoint 7.7 _does_ require that where there is > structural navigation provided pursuant to checkpoint 7.6, > that this [8.4] outline view _does_ present the same selection of "important > elements" as are the destinations reached via the navigation capability. > > Or I thought that was what we thought we decided when we put the "same > configuration" language in checkpoint 7.7. That was not my understanding. At our 26 September teleconf [1], we resolved to: [[[ 1. Make lists of important elements informative 2. Make minimal navigation requirements forward and backward 3. Use same configuration for important elements 7.6 and 8.4 4. Talk about Al's and others functional requirements for identifying important elements (element type and number of resulting navigable elements) ]]] I commented that "8.4 and 7.6 are separated for a reason. The two are not inherently bound." One reason: an outline may benefit people even if it's not navigable. Thus, a table of contents in a paperback book is useful, but not navigable directly. So my understanding is that the language you refer to is not legacy but is still there intentionally. I thought that we had decided that: - One requirement was for navigation of important elements. - One requirement was for an outline built of important elements. - The set of important elements was the same for both cases. For this reason, the requirement to be able to configure the set could be shared by both checkpoints. - Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000JulSep/0455.html > This version: > > [9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W > D-UAAG10-20001023 -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 18:10:44 UTC