- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:27:26 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Checkpoint 8.4 Where it says in the note ... This checkpoint does not require that the outline view be navigable, but this is recommended; refer to [456]checkpoint 7.6. This appears to be legacy language left over from before the changes in 7.6 and 7.7. It is quite unclear as it stands, in that checkpoint 7.7 _does_ require that where there is structural navigation provided pursuant to checkpoint 7.6, that this [8.4] outline view _does_ present the same selection of "important elements" as are the destinations reached via the navigation capability. Or I thought that was what we thought we decided when we put the "same configuration" language in checkpoint 7.7. Al -- Usage in headers. Comments in response to the last call request for comments have been classified S1, S2, or E based on the following rough scale: S1: Substantive matter of the first (highest) criticality or importance to the mission of the document. The standard set is ineffective, the document is self contradictory, etc. S2: Substantive matter of a somewhat lower criticality. The document is hard to comprehend, does not align well with related WAI documents, etc. E: Editorial matters. Not regarded as substantive. Re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000 This version: [9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W D-UAAG10-20001023
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 00:56:37 UTC