- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:41:12 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Hello,
The 29 September draft [1] includes definitions of "document
source" and "documetn source view":
| In this document, the term document source refers to the
| data that the user agent receives as the direct result of
| a request for a Web resource. A document source view
| represents all or part of a document in a way that exposes
| the markup language(s) used to build the Web resource.
| A source view often presents textual representations of
| content.
The term is only used twice in the document, in the note
after checkpoint 2.1:
| A document source view is an important part of a
| solution for providing access to content, but is not a
| sufficient solution on its own for all content.
and in the definition of "document object". Here's the proposal:
1) Delete the term "document source" from the spec
and saying "document object" instead in the note after 2.1:
| A document object view is an important part of a
| solution for providing access to content, but is not a
| sufficient solution on its own for all content.
2) Create a new definition of "document object view" based on
"document source view":
| A document object view represents all or part of the
| document object in a way that exposes the markup language(s)
| used to build it. A document object view often presents
| textual representations of content.
3) In the definition of "document object" change:
"This data generally comes from the document source..."
to:
"This data generally comes from markup..."
SUMMARY:
- The term "document source" is hard to define.
- We can get along with out it and use terms we already define.
Thank you,
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20000929
--
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 831 457-2842
Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 23:41:15 UTC