- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:41:12 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Hello, The 29 September draft [1] includes definitions of "document source" and "documetn source view": | In this document, the term document source refers to the | data that the user agent receives as the direct result of | a request for a Web resource. A document source view | represents all or part of a document in a way that exposes | the markup language(s) used to build the Web resource. | A source view often presents textual representations of | content. The term is only used twice in the document, in the note after checkpoint 2.1: | A document source view is an important part of a | solution for providing access to content, but is not a | sufficient solution on its own for all content. and in the definition of "document object". Here's the proposal: 1) Delete the term "document source" from the spec and saying "document object" instead in the note after 2.1: | A document object view is an important part of a | solution for providing access to content, but is not a | sufficient solution on its own for all content. 2) Create a new definition of "document object view" based on "document source view": | A document object view represents all or part of the | document object in a way that exposes the markup language(s) | used to build it. A document object view often presents | textual representations of content. 3) In the definition of "document object" change: "This data generally comes from the document source..." to: "This data generally comes from markup..." SUMMARY: - The term "document source" is hard to define. - We can get along with out it and use terms we already define. Thank you, - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20000929 -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 23:41:15 UTC