W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Editorial comments on UAAG 29 September draft

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:18:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010101614300.31390-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Jon Gunderson wrote:

  4. Checkpoint 2.1, what about META comments and other information in the 
  HEAD block, is that part of the DOM? 

CMN Yes.
  Is there anything in XML like the Head block that contains META
XML is a language for writing languages in. XML doesn't itself define a HEAD
element. But many languages writtenn in XML (e.g. XHTML - which is almost
exactly the same as HTML 4.0, SVG) do have such an element, or at least a
paralell mechanism. XML that includes the use of the namespaces specification
allows multiple kinds of XML to be mixed together, and one of the commonest
uses of this in existing implementation is for RDF metadata. (Amaya also uses
it to mix graphics, math and XHTML together)
  10. Conformance section 3.7: Do we need to specify what level of WCAG the 
  conformance claim must satisfy.  I suggest double-A, like UAAG.

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 16:18:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:38:28 UTC