- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 04:32:59 -0400
- To: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
jon gunderson wrote: > > Section 3.4 Content type labels > > 1. Audio label missing checkpoint 3.2, Yes. > remove 4.15 and 4.16 (add to speech > label), Do you mean 4.16 and 4.17? (not 4.15) I think that 4.16 and 4.17 are required (highlighting of selection and focus) in most of the groups. > and order checkpoints numerically. Yes. > 2. Image label missing 3.4 (if label is to be consistent with including > 3.3 in Text grouping for animations) Yes. > 3. Speech label missing 4.15, 4.16, 8.2 and 8.3 Yes. > 4. I think there are two issues in the use of the content type section: > helping developers to understand which checkpoints apply to them and > secondly to help consumers more easily understand if developer claims will > make a user agent more accessible to them. The groupings Text, Color, > Image, Animation, Video, Audio and Speech address the needs of developers > to easily identify which checkpoints are applicable to associated media > types. The groupings Multimedia and All, seem more useful to consumers > wanting to know more about the general accessibility of a user agent. Yes, that's a good way to think about these groupings. > I therefore propose an additional grouping primarily for consumers, GUI for > graphical user interface. GUI would include the following groupings and > checkpoint: > > Text, Color, Image, Animation and checkpoint 3.2. (Checkpoint 3.2 is part of Animation.) Ok by me. > This grouping would be applicable to current user agent technology like > Internet Explorer, Netscape Navigator and Opera. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 04:33:05 UTC