- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:35:26 -0400
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, barnicle@trace.wisc.edu, "'w3c-wai-ua@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Al Gilman wrote: > > At 01:30 PM 2000-08-18 -0500, Jon Gunderson wrote: > >I could live with that,. What do other people think? > > > AG:: > > There appears to be an editorial error in the email bearing the proposal, > that should be corrected to be crystal clear. > > >> > >>How about the following relative expression of the checkpoint: > >> > >> Provide a version of the product documentation that > >> conforms to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines > >> 1.0 [WCAG10]. [Priority 1 for Level A conformance, Priority 2 > >> for Level Double-A conformance, Priority 3 for Level Triple-A > >> conformance.] > >> > >>1) This isn't too long or complicated. > >>2) The implication is that if you want to be a level Double-A > >> conforming UA, your documentation has to conform to WCAG 1.0 > >> level A. If you want to be a Triple-AAA UA, your documentation > > AG:: where this line says level A, it should say level Double-A, as I read > the definitive statement above. Yes, my apologies for the error. _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Friday, 18 August 2000 16:35:50 UTC