- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 15:35:30 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 2000-07-10 13:15-0500, Jon Gunderson wrote: >>Jon Gunderson wrote: >> > >> > Ian, >> > Another approach to resolve this issue is that while only one view >> port may >> > be available at a time, the user agent should keep a list of viewports >> > available and allow the user to switch between the view ports. >> >>Can you explain how this works? > >1. In the example of FRAMES only one of the frames would be available, but >a list of frames that are part of the current document would be maintained >by the user agent. The user could access and display the frame they want >visible. What if several documents were open, each with frames. Should all be in the list of frames? >2. In the case of something like a source view the user could switch the >source view and the rendered view. That would be useful for any user, although for non-overlapping visual display, all that would do is move the point of regard into another view! >>What does it mean for a viewport >>to be available but not open? > >Maybe is the issue is more making some viewports visible and some not >visible. The siwtching is making a viewport visible or not visible. Not visible, but being the one containing the point of regard. >>Does that mean open but iconified? > >In a graphical interface the views could be listed in a menu called >"views" or "windows" for example or in a pop list that includes the view >titles. The visible view could be selected by the user. > >Jon Regards/Harvey
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 15:57:34 UTC