- From: Susan Lesch <susan@textet.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 23:38:07 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
These are a few ideas for very minor typographical improvements to your User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [1] Candidate Recommendation ("work in progress"). If they come too late, or are of no use to you, please ignore them. Comments on the Techniques Document are on their way separately. There are about six or seven references to HTML 4.0 that could be changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4. From here on, items are identified by section and paragraph or list item number. A quote follows, and then an idea for improvement. Comments are in brackets []. 1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 1 and par. 3 the the [twice] the 1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 3 item 1 (e.g,. (e.g., 1.2 Help orient the user - list item 1 etc., etc. 1.7 Validity of a claim - par. 3 Claimants are expected modify or retract Claimants are expected to modify or retract 1.7 Checkpoint applicability - second to last item (e.g,. (e.g., 2. Guideline 2 - par. 2 "...User agents should allow users to specify whether primary content should be rendered, equivalent alternatives, or both." [Not sure here but this could read something like:] User agents should allow users to specify whether primary content should be rendered, output as an equivalent alternative, or both. 2. Guideline 5 - list item 5 audio cues (users audio cues (for users 3. Glossary - Recognize etc etc. 3. Glossary - Rendered content c.f. cf. Checklists: In the Checklists [2,3], in the opening section for "This version," "postscript" could read "PostScript" and "pdf" could read "PDF". There is one outdated reference to HTML 4.0 in the last Priority 2 checkpoint. This could be changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4. References: [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chktable [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chklist.html Thanks for your time, and best wishes for your project, -- Susan Lesch susan@textet.com
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 02:38:18 UTC