minor typos in CR-UAAG10-20000128

These are a few ideas for very minor typographical improvements to 
your User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [1] Candidate 
Recommendation ("work in progress"). If they come too late, or are of 
no use to you, please ignore them. Comments on the Techniques 
Document are on their way separately.


There are about six or seven references to HTML 4.0 that could be 
changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4.

 From here on, items are identified by section and paragraph or list 
item number. A quote follows, and then an idea for improvement. 
Comments are in brackets [].

1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 1 and par. 3
the the [twice]
the

1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 3 item 1
(e.g,.
(e.g.,

1.2 Help orient the user - list item 1
etc.,
etc.

1.7 Validity of a claim - par. 3
Claimants are expected modify or retract
Claimants are expected to modify or retract

1.7 Checkpoint applicability - second to last item
(e.g,.
(e.g.,

2. Guideline 2 - par. 2
"...User agents should allow users to specify whether primary
     content should be rendered, equivalent alternatives, or both."
[Not sure here but this could read something like:]
     User agents should allow users to specify whether primary
     content should be rendered, output as an equivalent alternative,
     or both.

2. Guideline 5 - list item 5
audio cues (users
audio cues (for users

3. Glossary - Recognize
etc
etc.

3. Glossary - Rendered content
c.f.
cf.


Checklists:

In the Checklists [2,3], in the opening section for "This version," 
"postscript" could read "PostScript" and "pdf" could read "PDF".

There is one outdated reference to HTML 4.0 in the last Priority 2 
checkpoint. This could be changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4.


References:
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chktable
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chklist.html

Thanks for your time, and best wishes for your project,
-- 
Susan Lesch
susan@textet.com

Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 02:38:18 UTC