- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:57:28 -0500
- To: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>
- CC: W3C-WAI-UA <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Madeleine Rothberg wrote: > > Hi, > I have a concern about the note following Checkpoint 2.1 > (Taken from the 20 December working draft): Hi Madeleine, I propose that we remove the Note and push it to the Techniques as follows: <quote> Some users benefit from simultaneous access to primary and alternative content. For instance, users with low vision may want to view images (even imperfectly) but require a text equivalent for the image; the text may be rendered with a large font or as speech. </quote> My concern with the same note is that it talks about requirements without really making any. Since it's advisory only, I think it's better in the techniques. -Ian > 2.1 Ensure that the user has access to all content, including > alternative equivalents for content. [Priority 1] > Note. Although it is not a requirement that alternative equivalents be available > at the same time as primary content, some users may benefit from simultaneous > access. For instance, users with low vision may want to view images (even > imperfectly) but require a text equivalent for the image; the text may be > rendered with a large font or as speech. > > I have been assuming that this checkpoint is the umbrella requiring UAs > to provide access to multimedia alternative equivalents and that the > later checkpoint 2.6 that requires synchronizing captions or auditory > description is a special case of this. Since the note on 2.1 explicitly > says that it is not a requirement to render at the same time, but 2.6 > says that some tracks must be rendered synchronously, perhaps the note > for 2.1 should say it is not a requirement for all alternative equivalents > to be available at the same time as primary content, but see Checkpoint 2.6 > for cases where that is required. > > -Madeleine -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Saturday, 15 January 2000 16:57:39 UTC