- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:28:05 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Ian, For synthesized speech I think the minimum requirement should be the range of values supported by the synthesizer. Most synthesizer technology allows a user agent to enumerate these values for selection by the user. The CSS specifications could be a second choice, if the API does not provide for enumeration. This proposal would also allow the keeping of the current articulation charactersitics. in the few people with head injuries that I haved worked with, pitch and gender were important factors and I would hate to see them removed. Jon At 03:13 PM 6/12/00 -0400, you wrote: >Hello, > >I propose that minimal requirements for the following checkpoints >from the 10 June draft [1] be established on the basis of >property values in the CSS2 Recommendation [2]: > > 4.8 Allow the user to configure and control the audio volume. > 4.9 Allow the user to configure and control synthesized speech > playback rate. > 4.11 Allow the user to configure synthesized speech pitch, gender, > and other articulation characteristics. > >The relevant CSS2 properties are 'volume' (in CSS, for speech >only, but we can generalize its values here) and the voice >characteristics properties of section 19.8 [3]: > >This is not a requirement for user agents to implement CSS, >but to allow the same range of abstract values as specified in CSS. >CSS also allows numbers and percentages, but I don't want to >make those requirements. > >For instance, for volume, the following range would be mapped to >six "real" levels by the user agent: silent, x-soft, soft, >medium, loud, x-loud. Similarly, for speech-rate: x-slow, >slow, medium, fast, x-fast. The relative rates "faster" and >"slower" are relative values specific to CSS inheritance, >so would not be required. > >I will write out the specific values for checkpoints 4.8, 4.9, >and 4.11, but for now I want to get feedback as to whether >people think that this is a reasonable approach. > >IMPORTANT: I propose that we delete "and other articulation >characteristics" from checkpoint 4.11 since that makes it >much harder to specify minimal requirements. > > - Ian > >[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20000610/ >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512 >[3] >http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/aural.html#voice-char-props >-- >Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Tel: +1 831 457-2842 >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 13:28:40 UTC