- From: John Gardner <John.Gardner@orst.edu>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 09:17:16 -0700
- To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I think you are trying too hard for preciseness that's unnecessary. Consider: "A user agent is *anything* that retrieves and renders Web content, including text, graphics, sounds, video, images, and other content types." "anything" is about as broad as you can get. John At 10:58 PM 6/8/00 -0400, Harvey Bingham wrote: >At 2000-06-07 16:01-0700, Dick Brown wrote: >Good idea. Is this broad enough to include special hardware and its >software interface? > >>The User Agent guidelines currently define user agent in this way: >> >>"A user agent is an application that retrieves and renders Web content, >>including text, graphics, sounds, video, images, and other content types." >> >>I propose we expand that definition to say (new text between asterisks): >> >>"A user agent is an application *or operating system component* that >>retrieves and renders Web content, including text, graphics, sounds, video, >>images, and other content types." >> >>Why the change? There are technologies that Microsoft does not consider >>applications, but rather part of the operating system, that wouldn't be >>covered by the User Agent guidelines under the current definition. >> >>Obviously, the OS vs. application issue has received some attention outside >>the scope of the WAI, and while I am not prepared to discuss that issue in >>detail, I hope we can agree on the broader definition. >> >>Dick Brown >>Program Manager, Web Accessibility >>Microsoft Corp. >>http://www.microsoft.com/enable/ >Regards/Harvey Bingham > John A. Gardner Professor and Director, Science Access Project Department of Physics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 tel: (541) 737 3278 FAX: (541) 737 1683 SAP URL: http://dots.physics.orst.edu/
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 12:20:07 UTC