- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:01:05 -0500
- To: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
David, I am a little concerned about trying to make individual checkpoint point level more complicated and using them to tell developers what needs persistence along with another functionality. I think if we use the word control and put our persistence requirements in the configuration section we will make the document much easier for developers to understand. If we start to talk about persistence in individual checkpoints then we might as well get rid of checkpoint 10.7, since it would be duplicating the requirements in other checkpoints. I would rather see the emphasis on control in other checkpoints and then use 10.7 determine what should be persistent and use the minimum requirements in 10.7 as the means to define persistent features required. 10.7 For the configuration requirements of this document, allow the user to save user preferences in a profile. [Priority 2] Jon At 08:01 AM 5/19/00 -0400, David Poehlman wrote: >I suggest a different approach. some things that are now not controllable >are setable and some of that subset should be controllable. I proppose we >use set to mean obtain persistence as in set font family and controll to >mean dynamically interact with or change. We need this distinction. >-- >Hands-On Technolog(eye)s >ftp://poehlman.clark.net >http://poehlman.clark.net >mailto:poehlman@clark.net >voice 301-949-7599 >end sig. Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Friday, 19 May 2000 11:01:13 UTC