- From: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 19:00:23 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Phill wrote: > 1. Alternative ... primary content > we are not asking for alternative to attributes are we?? - of course > not. Ian wrote: >I don't understand your statement. If we define content to include attributes, then the statement: > 1. Alternative equivalents should be available through the User Interface > in place of or in conjunction with primary content would also mean "alternative equivalents to attributes should be available through the User Interface in place of or in conjunction with the primary attributes" - which no longer makes sense. I was just substituting the word "attribute" for the word "content", since attribute is currently part of the definition of content. If attribute we NOT part of the definition, then I couldn't substitute the words. My point being that when I substitute the word "attribute" for the word "content", many of our statements no longer make sense - hence my request to delete attributes from the definition of content. Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Monday, 1 May 2000 20:10:25 UTC