Re: Issue 208: Proposed wording for checkpoint 9.2

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> How about allow the user to request...

Please submit the entire sentence. I have had a very difficult
time expressing all the pieces in one simple sentence. 

 - Ian
 
> chaals
> 
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Ian Jacobs wrote:
> 
>   Per my action of the 10 April face-to-face meeting [1], here
>   is a proposal to clarify checkpoint 9.2 (issue 208). The Working Group
>   felt that this checkpoint was intended to allow configuration of
>   prompting (like all the other checkpoints), but the wording did not
>   capture that. Here is a proposed clarification:
> 
>   <OLD>
>   9.2 Prompt the user to confirm any form submission triggered indirectly,
>   that is by any means other than the user activating an explicit form
>   submit control.
>   </OLD>
> 
>   <NEW>
>   When configured to do so, prompt the user to confirm any form
>   submission triggered indirectly, that is by any means other than the
>   user activating an explicit form submit control.
>   </NEW>
> 
>    - Ian
> 
>   [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2000/04/rfbd-20000410#issue-208
>   --
>   Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>   Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
>   Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
> 
> 
> --
> Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
> Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
> Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783

Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2000 23:37:20 UTC