Re: Checkpoint 4.2 second look

Rich,
This has been raised before and was resolved to stay at priority 1, since
some fonts may be impossible for people with some types of visual
impairments to read even if they are enlarged.

Jon


At 07:27 PM 4/6/00 -0400, schwer@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
>
>Checkkpoint 4.2 "allow user to configure font family" should be a
>priority 2 (not a priority 1) because selecting a larger
>size is covered in Checkpoint 4.1
>
>Rich
>
>Rich Schwerdtfeger
>Lead Architect, IBM Special Needs Systems
>EMail/web: schwer@us.ibm.com http://www.austin.ibm.com/sns/rich.htm
>
>"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
>I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.",
>Frost
>

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua

Received on Friday, 7 April 2000 10:39:30 UTC