Re: Important: Issues relating to checkpoint 2.1 raised during 30 March teleconference.

Gregory,
Build M14 of Mozilla did not have a feature that I could find to render
NOFRAMES.

Jon


At 03:49 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
>aloha, jon!
>
>you wrote, quote
>One point advocated by gregory is that NOFRAMES content be available 
>through the UI and that this should be a requirement for complying with 
>Checkpoint 2.1.  Whether we change the wording of checkpoint 2.1 or not 
>both the new version of Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 for the Macintosh and 
>Opera 3.60 for Windows allow themselves to be configured to render NOFRAMES 
>content instead of the frame content.  These examples could be included in 
>the techniques document for the checkpoint.
>unquote
>
>exposition of NOFRAMES by quote mainstream unquote UAs is already -- at 
>least in some circles -- a fait accompli...  does anyone know if Mozilla 
>supports exposition of NOFRAMES as an alternative to rendering frames?
>
>gregory.
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>He that lives on Hope, dies farting
>      -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
>--------------------------------------------------------
>Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
>    WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
>         <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html>
>--------------------------------------------------------

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua

Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2000 10:26:09 UTC