- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 11:07:38 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Participants
Gregory Rosmaita, VICUG NYC
Kitch Barnicle, Trace Center
Harvey Bingham, Bingham Associates
Jim Thatcher, IBM Special Needs
David Poehlman, Blind Access Review Board
Ian Jacobs, W3C, UA Guidelines Editor
Charles McCathieNevile, W3C
Richard Schwerdtfeger, IBM
Glen Gordon, Henter-Joyce Inc.
Wilson Craig, Henter-Joyce Inc.
David Clark, CAST, Inc
Hans Riesebos, ALVA
Jon Gunderson, University of Illinois, UA Chair
Mark Novak, Trace Center
Judy Brewer, W3C
Mickey Quenzer, Productivity Works
TBA, Microsoft
Agenda
Monday, 11 October
8:00 Transportation leaves from DoubleTree to Microsoft Corporation/Building 30
8:00 - 8:30 Continental Breakfast
8:30 Preliminaries
Introductions
Review of agenda
Review Open Action Items (10 minutes max)
1.JG: Run pwWebSpeak through the guidelines
Status: Contact pwWebSpeak person to finish the review
2.JG: Contact Lakespur Roca related to posting for review of keyboard
support
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/1999OctDec/0015.html
3.JG: Contact MR about SMIL techniques
4.JG: Review RS comments on current working draft and update the issue list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0063.html
5.IJ: Contact Microsoft about participation at F2F meeting in Redmond
6.IJ: Contact Marja about writing a proposal for what should be changed
related to checkpoint 2.1 issues
7.IJ: Split Checkpoint 1.1 into support device indepdence and use
standard APIs. Clarify that not all APIs required. Results
dependent on Rich proposal.
8.IJ: Propose a checkpoint like the ones for form about table summary
information (checkpoint 9.9 and 9.10)
9.IJ Change title of Guideline 7 to reflect more than just w3c
technologies accessibility
10.IJ: Add checkpoint 6.6 to guidelines 7
11.GG: Review proposal for techniques for accessing content.
12.GR: Write a proposal to address issues about spawned windows.
13.DP: Run Jaws for Windows through the guidelines
14.MR: Working on SMIL techniques in addition to SMIL access note.
15.RS: Propose rewording of Checkpoint 1.1
Process Overview and Update (30 minutes max)
1.Last Call (3-4 weeks)
2.Proposed Recommendation (3-4 weeks)
3.Recommendation
4.Reviewers for last call
5.Guidelines and Checklist (reccommendation)
6.Techniques (note)
7.Impact Matrix (appendix to guidelines?)
8.Press release
9.Issue list
10.Product reviews
11.Minority opinons (conformance, any others)
12.Testimonials
Discussion of Open Issues
1.Issue #78: Review requirements for window spawning
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#78
2.Issue #85: Priority of checkpoint on language support
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#85
3.Issue #86: Should Guideline about support for W3C technologies be
broadened or narrowed?
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#86
4.Issue #87: Proposed wording change about user-control of highlight
rendering
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#87
5.Issue #88: Proposed wording change for checkpoint on access to
selected content.
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#88
6.Issue #91: Proposed reformulation of frames checkpoint
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#91
7.Issue #92: Proposed checkpoint about form orientation
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#92
8.Issue #93: Proposed modification to definition of "applicable checkpoint"
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#93
9.Issue #94: Reenforcing the the use of standard keyboard APIs in
guideline 2
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#94
10.Issue #95: Proposed checkpoint: Choose from among style sheets
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#95
11.Issue #97: Questions about wording of document outline checkpoint
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#97
12.Issue #98: What does "appropriate" mean in "appropriate w3c
recommendations"?
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#98
13.Issue #99: Priority of control of GUI layout should not be priority 1
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#99
14.Issue #100: Proposed Note on verifiability of some checkpoints
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#100
15.Issue #101: Wording of checkpoint on document change notification
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#101
16.Issue #102: List of problematic checkpoints.
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#102
17.Issue #103: Proposed change to priority wording
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#103
18.Issue #104: Proposed additions to conformance claim requirements
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#104
19.Issue #105: ACCESSKEY implementation issues
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#105
20.Issue #106: Proposed Abstract revision
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#106
21.Issue #107: Proposed new checkpoint: 6.7 Support assistive technology
accessibility standards defined for plug-in and virtual machine systems
used by your browser.
http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#107
10:00-10:15 Break
12:00-13:00 Lunch
15:00-15:15 Break
17:30 Transportation from Microsoft Corporation/Building 30 to Resturant
20:00 Transportation from Resturant to DoubleTree Hotel
Tuesday October 12, 1999
8:00 Transportation leaves from DoubleTree to Microsoft Corporation/Building 30
8:00 - 8:30 Continental Breakfast
Review Guidelines Glossary Definitions (15 minutes max)
Discussion of Techniques Document
The purpose of the discussion is to identify missing, incorrect or
misleading information in the techniques document. We will review
each section of the techniques documentto identify
Table of Contents Organization of the Techniques Document
3.1 Access to content
3.2 Device independence
3.3 User control of style
3.4 Viewports, selection and focus
3.5 Navigation of active elements
3.6 Status information
3.7 Keyboard access
3.8 Configuration
3.9 Documentation
4.1 System conventions
4.2 Testing UA operation with platform standards
4.3 Accessibility Features
4.4 Document object model
4.5 Information for assistive technology
5.0 Support for HTML accessibility
5.1 Equivalent information
5.2 Links
5.3 Tables
5.4 Frames
5.5 Scripts
6.0 Support for CSS accessibility
7.0 Support SMIL accessibility
10:00-10:15 Break
12:00-13:00 Lunch
15:00-15:15 Break
15:15 Review of Meeting Action Items
15:30 Adjourn meeting
17:30 Transportation from Microsoft Corporation/Building 30 to Doubletree Hotel
Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street
Champaign, IL 61820
Voice: 217-244-5870
Fax: 217-333-0248
E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Friday, 8 October 1999 12:03:03 UTC