- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 23:57:53 -0400
- To: User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, Kelly Ford <kford@teleport.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@whosoeverwill.com>
Aloha, all!
Whilst I applaud the intent behind Checkpoint 10.6 (as
contained in the 11 August 1999 draft),
quote
Allow the user to request to be prompted before a form is
submitted. [Priority 3]
unquote
I am troubled by its vagueness, the lack of associated
techniques, and by its classification as a P3. The crux of
the problem, as I perceive it, is this:
A) As a user, I do NOT want to be prompted EACH time I
submit a form, provided that I submitted the form by
activating its SUBMIT mechanism. If, however, I simply hit
the ENTER or the RETURN key from within a FORM control
(i.e., rather than explicitly activating the SUBMIT
mechanism), I would like the UA to request confirmation
before submitting the form content.
B) As a user, I do NOT want the form content automatically
submitted if I inadvertently press the ENTER or RETURN key.
PROBLEM STATEMENT FOR POINT B: Inadvertently pressing the
RETURN or ENTER key is quite a prevalent phenomenon
amongst users of every level of expertise - especially
those who often find it necessary to switch between user
agents. Lynx, for example, uses the ENTER key within
FORMs as a means of exposing drop-down (or pop-up,
depending upon your point of view) SELECT menus. Thus,
when one encounters a SELECT menu using Lynx, one:
exposes the content of the menu by pressing the ENTER
key, and then is able to navigate between OPTIONs using
the up and down arrows or via Lynx's text-search feature.
When one finds the appropriate OPTION, it is selected by
pressing ENTER, which causes the selected item to be
displayed in the SELECT menu listbox.
The problems posed by the default "submit on enter"
feature of most GUI browsers, is not limited to the
SELECT menu problem outlined above. Lynx (as well as
several other text-based browsers) uses the ENTER/RETURN
key as a means of toggling several FORM controls, such as
the selection of checkboxes and radio buttons.
Moreover, I would like to stress that the "Auto-Submit-On-
Enter" feature is not only quite problematic for one
operating in an eyes-free environment, but for those
unaccustomed to using online forms, and for those
unfamiliar with a particular user agent's default key-
bindings for forms, as well as those (like myself and
countless others) who surf the web using a variety of
browsers, often switching from browser to browser -- ALT-
TAB-ing from Lynx32 to MSIE to Opera, for example -- in
order to better comprehend the contents of a page or
whilst attempting to navigate an poorly structured site
or a poorly marked-up form
C) As a speech user, I am constantly frustrated and
misdirected by the use of javascript and event handler
controlled pseudo-forms, wherein the user is presented with
a menu (in the form of a listbox in GUI browsers), and is
redirected to a different viewport upon selection of an
OPTION.
PROBLEM STATEMENT FOR POINT C: The markup behind such
pseudo-forms is a mix of javascript (in particular the
"function switchpage(select)" command) and HTML FORM
controls, which utilize HTML4's event handler script
attributes (in particular the "onchange" event handler
attribute has been defined. An example (gleaned from the
document source for <http://www.pricescan.com> follows:
<SELECT NAME="condition" onchange="switchpage(this)">
When such a menu Is encountered by a websurfer who is
using speech synthesis in conjunction with a javascript
enabled user agent, his or her instinctual reaction will
be to use the UA's navigational mechanism (usually the up
and down arrows) to review the available OPTIONs.
However, each time a new OPTION is displayed, the user is
abruptly taken to a new viewport. Conversely, if one is
using a user agent that does not support javascript (or
has javascript support disabled), then the menu is
displayed, but since there is no SUBMIT mechanism
associated with it, there is no mechanism by which one
can use the menu to quickly switch viewports - the
ostensive purpose of this type of pseudo-form. And while
one can avoid having the viewport abruptly changed when
encountering the menu (at least in the Windows
environment) by using the ALT-LEFT-ARROW keystroke to
display the menu in a drop-down list, (a) very few users
know this keystroke, and (b) when one encounters a
listbox on a page in an aural environment, one usually
assumes that he or she is navigating a valid FORM, in
which there are no unexpected side effects to perusing
the contents of a SELECT menu using the arrow keys
NOTE: I have chosen to address the issue of pseudo-forms
in this context, for, although they straddle the boundary
between "Form Controls" and Checkpoint 5.8, pseudo-forms
rely on FORM elements for activation This issue has been
raised in the past, particularly by Chris Kreussling --
consult (long wrapping URI warning!)
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999JanMar/0276.html>
Therefore, I propose the following:
PROPOSAL 1. reword Checkpoint 10.6 as follows (note the
priority level change):
Prompt the user to confirm the submission of form content
if the submission mechanism is not directly activated.
[Priority 2]
NOTE: The issuance of the confirmation prompt should be
controlled by a user-configurable schedule.
Confirmation of "Submit-on-Enter" need not be the
default setting.
TECHNIQUE
The issuance of the confirmation prompt should be
controlled by the user, according to a user-
configurable schedule. The default setting should be:
"Prompt Each Time Before Submitting Form Content"
Other options could include:
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms in this
Site"
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms in this
Domain"
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms "
If possible, the user should also be offered a "Accept
this Value and Don't Ask Me Again" option, when the
confirmation prompt is first displayed
2. add the following checkpoint to the "Form Control"
portion of Guideline 10 and cross-reference it under
Checkpoint 5.8 (the only checkpoint I could find which
addresses scripting directly)
PROPOSED NEW CHECKPOINT (CHECKPOINT 10.x)
When there is only one field in a form, or when the form
lacks a user-addressable SUBMIT mechanism, prompt the
user before automatically submitting the form content.
[Priority 1]
TECHNIQUE 1
The issuance of the confirmation prompt should be
controlled by the user, according to a user-
configurable schedule. The default setting should be:
"Prompt Each Time Before Submitting Form Content"
Other options could include:
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms in this Site"
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms in this Domain"
"Submit Form Content on ENTER for All Forms "
If possible, the user should also be offered a "Accept
this Value and Don't Ask Me Again" option, when the
confirmation prompt is first displayed
TECHNIQUE 2:
If the submission of the single field form is achieved
via a script or an HTML4 event handler, such as
"onchange", prompt the user for confirmation before
submitting the form content.
NOTE: I am not quite sure that this new checkpoint (which I
have arbitrarily numbered 10.x) quite covers the concerns I
outlined in PROBLEM STATEMENT FOR POINT C, above, or Issue
#58 on the UA Issues List, and wonder whether what I have
identified as TECHNIQUE 2 for Checkpoint 10.x doesn't merit
a checkpoint of its own -- or, at least, be included as a
NOTE: appended to Checkpoint 10.x.
In any event the Techniques for the proposed checkpoint
should also reference the WCAG's Checkpoint 6.3, which is
P1, and the WCAG Techniques Document's Topic 2.13, the
introduction to which states:
Content developers must ensure that pages are accessible
with scripts turned off or in browsers that don't support
scripts.
In particular, Technique 2.13.2, which deals explicitly
with event handlers.
Gregory
--------------------------------------------------------
He that lives on Hope, dies farting
-- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
President, WebMaster, & Minister of Propaganda,
VICUG NYC <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/>
--------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 23:58:47 UTC