Re: comments on section 4

>along with Kitch's comments, I was wondering why 4.1.2, Ensure that product
>documentation is available in at least one accessible, open standard
>electronic
>format (e.g., HTML, XML, ASCII)., was not a priority 1?   Just seems a bit
>strange that so much effort is going into improving the UA, yet  "at least 
>one"
>accessible form of the documentation is only a "should" (priority 2
>definition).
>
>mark

One somewhat defensible argument for this that I heard this week is that 
installation is something that most folks do once or twice, while using 
the product is a constant issue.  It may be considered less critical that 
installation be independent than use.  I'm not sure if I agree, but it is 
an argument.

Denis Anson