- From: Denis Anson <danson@miseri.edu>
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 99 17:28:08 -0500
- To: "mark novak" <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
>along with Kitch's comments, I was wondering why 4.1.2, Ensure that product >documentation is available in at least one accessible, open standard >electronic >format (e.g., HTML, XML, ASCII)., was not a priority 1? Just seems a bit >strange that so much effort is going into improving the UA, yet "at least >one" >accessible form of the documentation is only a "should" (priority 2 >definition). > >mark One somewhat defensible argument for this that I heard this week is that installation is something that most folks do once or twice, while using the product is a constant issue. It may be considered less critical that installation be independent than use. I'm not sure if I agree, but it is an argument. Denis Anson
Received on Saturday, 20 February 1999 17:26:54 UTC