Re: My take on 7.2.2

No, I don't. So far. I haven't read what Al Gilman has to say on the topic
yet...

On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Jon Gunderson wrote:

  You don't think we should make 7.2.1 a guideline and then have a new set of
  checkpoints related to the guideline?
  
  Jon
  
  
  At 11:16 PM 4/7/99 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >7.2:
  >
  >7.2.1 This seems to be subsumed by checkpoint 7.2.3, especially if the
  words, "particularly for exposing programmatic interfaces" are added.
  >
  >7.2.2 [Priority 1]
  >For desktop graphical browsers. Ensure that exported interfaces conform
  >to those specified by a W3C DOM Recommendation
  >
  >I would only change this slightly:
  >
  >For all User Agents. Ensure that where an exported interface is specified
  by a W3C DOM recommendation, the interface conforms to the DOM specification.
  >
  >OR
  >Implement W3C DOM Recommendations and expose them.
  >
  >7.2.3 see above
  >
  >So basically I am not sure that there is anything much I want to change in
  >7.2
  >
  >Charles
  >
  >
  >--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
  >phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
  >W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
  >MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
  > 
  Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
  Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
  Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
  University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
  1207 S. Oak Street
  Champaign, IL 61820
  
  Voice: 217-244-5870
  Fax: 217-333-0248
  E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
  WWW:	http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
  	http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA

Received on Thursday, 8 April 1999 13:21:50 UTC