W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: UA WD review regarding physical disabilities

From: Paul Adelson <paul.adelson@citicorp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:36:41 -0500
Message-Id: <199808131437.KAA25729@egate2.citicorp.com>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Following on what Charles (Chuck) Oppermann said,

It sounds like Microsoft may be willing to reserve specific key combinations to
support a specific navigation strategy in their standards. Am I interpreting
your message correctly, Chuck?

If so, it's a great opportunity. If the Mac standard ends up being slightly
different from the Windows standard, we'll still be ahead of where we are now.

Has anyone compiled a matrix of reserved key combinations and their functions on
various platforms, like Ctrl-Z on Windows? And perhaps more important,
unreserved key combinations? Does Microsoft maintain such a list for its
standards, Chuck?

 -- Paul

Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote:

> Being one of the people who "resisted more specific ideas" I'm curious how
> my comments got interpreted to mean that accessibility was secondary.
> Good usability is the first priority of any user interface designer.  If the
> keystrokes are different between each application - how does that help
> accessibility?
> I only mean to say that any recommendations are obviously going to have to
> fit into platform that the browser is running on.  Are you going to force
> people to not use the Command Key on a Macintosh or to use CTRL+Z on a PC
> because they are close together (but conflict with the existing Undo action
> of CTRL+Z?)
> I'm interjecting common sense, not placing accessibility second.
> Charles Oppermann
> Program Manager, Active Accessibility, Microsoft Corporation
> mailto:chuckop@microsoft.com http://microsoft.com/enable/
> "A computer on every desk and in every home, usable by everyone!"
Received on Thursday, 13 August 1998 10:37:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:38:19 UTC