- From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 07:53:26 -0400
- To: dd@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 09:58 AM 09/06/98 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >> Think of an embedded logo, say the one at the beginning of >> <http://www.htmlhelp.com/>. This image has alternative text, "The Web >> Design Group", to communicate the information contained in the object. The >> image could also be given a title, "Web Design Group Logo", which acts as a >> short description in this (and most) cases. The image might also have a >> long description: "The Web Design Group's logo shows the letters W, D, and >> G in black next to a picture of the Earth..." > >What's wrong with: > ><OBJECT title="Web Design Group Logo" data=wdg.gif> > The Web Design Group. <A href=wdg.htm rel=dlink>D</A> ></OBJECT> It's just a more cryptic version of <OBJECT title="Web Design Group Logo" data=wdg.gif> The Web Design Group. <A href=wdg.htm rel=dlink>Long description</A> </OBJECT> which forces the user to recognize "The Web Design Group." as an object with a visual description. Many users (i.e., me) would prefer when browsing non-visually to be given a completely non-visual page. The notion of some text actually being an image is an unnecessary distraction for these users. >> Different users may want some or all of this information, but we should not >> force it on everyone. The non-visual user who treats the Web as a >> non-visual medium would probably prefer simply the alternative text. We >> need LONGDESC on OBJECT to allow for this level of granularity. > >To get more specific, we could also advocate using > ><OBJECT title="Web Design Group Logo" data=wdg.gif> ><PARAM name="longdesc" value="wdg.htm"> > The Web Design Group ></OBJECT> > >But I don't think we need a new attribute on OBJECT. I think the universal applicability of a long description would make LONGDESC as useful on OBJECT as some of its other attributes like TYPE or WIDTH, which could also be specified using the PARAM element. However, I do like the way that your use of PARAM allows the user to choose exactly how he or she wants to deal with objects, without forcing the concept of a visual page on the user. Using PARAM for the long description would be a great interim solution, or a good second-best if the idea of LONGDESC on OBJECT is rejected. -- Liam Quinn
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 1998 07:53:18 UTC