- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:58:29 +0200
- To: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
> Think of an embedded logo, say the one at the beginning of > <http://www.htmlhelp.com/>. This image has alternative text, "The Web > Design Group", to communicate the information contained in the object. The > image could also be given a title, "Web Design Group Logo", which acts as a > short description in this (and most) cases. The image might also have a > long description: "The Web Design Group's logo shows the letters W, D, and > G in black next to a picture of the Earth..." What's wrong with: <OBJECT title="Web Design Group Logo" data=wdg.gif> The Web Design Group. <A href=wdg.htm rel=dlink>D</A> </OBJECT> > Different users may want some or all of this information, but we should not > force it on everyone. The non-visual user who treats the Web as a > non-visual medium would probably prefer simply the alternative text. We > need LONGDESC on OBJECT to allow for this level of granularity. To get more specific, we could also advocate using <OBJECT title="Web Design Group Logo" data=wdg.gif> <PARAM name="longdesc" value="wdg.htm"> The Web Design Group </OBJECT> But I don't think we need a new attribute on OBJECT.
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 1998 03:58:21 UTC