- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 10:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
- To: w3c-wai-rc@w3.org
- Cc: gerald@w3.org
Here is an idea I want to get on file for consideration by the ER groups: A logging gateway that helps capture information to document a trouble experience by a user. The problem today: HTTP troubles are pretty much hidden from the user. Browsers don't have technical support. The solution is to have a middleware engine that logs a session in which the user reproduces the problem. This will capture the User-Agent headers, the HTTP traffic, and give the site tech support a much better trouble ticket than the user can. The process would work a lot like validator.w3.org or Silas's gateway, but the deal is "If you have trouble gaining access to a site or page on the web, get the URL for where you were trying to go, go to [logging gateway] and see if you can reproduce the problem. If the problem repeats, follow the instructions at [logging gateway] for filing a trouble report." For HTTP errors, this is a W3C enforcement activity more than a WAI enforcement activity. But disabled users are especially vulnerable to quality problems in the web services. They would be more likely to use this thing and contribute to the overall quality of the Web thereby. Al
Received on Saturday, 18 July 1998 10:48:49 UTC