- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 14:45:14 +0100
- To: "Kasday, Leonard R (Len), ALTEC" <kasday@att.com>
- cc: "'wai rc group post'" <w3c-wai-rc@w3.org>
> Which if any of the following shall we deal with? > > 1. accessibility tests that can be done in a purely automatic manner > 2. tests that require human judgment > 3. tools to help the humans do those judgments I think 3 naturally comes with 2. > 4. an algorithm for an overall score 1 to 4 are in the bag I would call evaluation/rating services. (Bobby, weblint, robot, etc) > 5. automated repair of access problems > 6. semi-automated repair of access problems These are in the "improving" bag. I think 6 is more in the realm of the AU group. > a. write a specification We need to start with that and see what exists that fit this spec and what should be done.
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 1998 08:49:29 UTC