- From: Suzan Dolloff <averil@concentric.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 19:41:36 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-rc@w3.org
Oh, goody. A cross-post, and one whose topical appropriateness is probably already in question, regardless of where it appears! S. Dolloff said (in the email to which Kynn is responding): First, I am not a "Disabled Person," I am a person with a disability. If you use my name, that should be capitalized, not my "Physical Condition." K. Bartlett said: >I think that worrying about specific terms distracts us from >realizing that we're on the same side and share common goals >here; it's possible that the original poster's culture could have >lead her to use a term that's completely appropriate and fine, but >which may offend you. These things happen -- and in general, I >feel it's best to look beyond the particular terms and instead >focus on greater issues, especially if we understand what she >meant. SD:: It was having a physical condition -- WHATEVER it's called -- being capitalized for which I expressed the opinion it's unnecessary and might even suggest to some a distinction is being made which no one intended and no one needs. If this body can debate ad nauseum the purpose or phrasing of TITLE or SUMMARY or OBJECT, I feel perfectly justified in addressing an issue of personhood when it is introduced in the same forum. K. Bartlett said: >There are some of you who have done it -- who have taken the >technical steps and financial steps and logistical steps >necessary to put yourself on the web. And that's _great_, and >I applaud you for it. SD:: I neither require, nor seek, your applause. Please tell me how I might have phrased my entire email differently that you would not have so totally misunderstood its intent. S. Dolloff wrote (and has been taken VERY far out of context): >It has been my observation that disabled people hold a kind of morbid >fascination to those who are not disabled. K. Bartlett wrote: >That's a pretty broad generalization; I don't think it's true to >the extent that you may think it is. I can only speak from the >standpoint of a non-disabled person, though. :) SD:: Indeed, you are speaking from a non-disabled perspective. As I recall, this thread began when someone mentioned her desire to hear from disabled people on the Internet. K. Bartlett wrote: >Me? I think it's a symptom of my overactive sense of justice. >Too many comic books as a kid, don'tcha know. > >--Kynn, Superhero SD:: I might suggest you become more attentive when listening to the people whose cause you are "championing" then. Respectfully Opined, Ree' Dolloff mailto:averil@concentric.net
Received on Saturday, 18 April 1998 20:40:01 UTC