- From: Lucy Greco <lgreco@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 12:19:51 -0700
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESOp7ox8sEA85TBh--ooyD=5kV-YUyh7hNmXDH8KqUQ3RqPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
so because it does not say that many many people think its not nessasary and i say if it does not say that why and when will it Berkeley IT <https://technology.berkeley.edu/home> Lucy Greco, Web Accessibility Evangelist Campus IT Experience Phone: (510) 289-6008 | Email: lgreco@berkeley.edu | We champion diversity. We act with integrity. We deliver. We innovate. On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:03 PM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 05/08/2024 18:56, Lucy Greco wrote: > > hi I was going to stay out of this conversation but i find that i > > can't! if the standard keyboard commands are used in a way that is > > not standard it can reely cause havoc > > All valid points, but again: this was never part of the WCAG SC 2.1.1. > Nowhere did it state that a page must use "standard" keystrokes. Only > that there must be a way for keyboard users to operate things. The > "change" in 2.1.1 understanding that happened was to make that clear. > > Nobody is disputing that it isn't a problem, but there was never > normative wording that said so. > > Ditto for the need to be "discoverable". > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ > * https://github.com/patrickhlauke > * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke > > >
Received on Monday, 5 August 2024 19:20:33 UTC