- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:36:32 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Thanks Bryan, these are all useful and good observations. To the original point, these are all things that are not normatively required by the SC, and never have been. Many auditors have added these in the own interpretation or what 2.1.1 should say, and that these factors are all involved in deciding whether or not content passes or fails 2.1.1, even though this was not in the spec per se. Hence the recent additions to the understanding in 2.2 tried to clarify this, as it historically led to inconsistent audit results. P -- Patrick H. Lauke * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ * https://github.com/patrickhlauke * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 2 August 2024 09:36:39 UTC