- From: Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:24:49 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2024 16:25:07 UTC
Thank you, Patrick. I had a 2.0 reference hanging around. This was improved in 2.1, and of course in the 2.2 technique you linked. The technique for improvement on an unlabeled glyph is still a good one, though. -Madeleine From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> Date: Friday, February 9, 2024 at 2:59 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Subject: Re: Unicode characters used as images On 06/02/2024 21:31, Madeleine Rothberg wrote: > https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/F26 <https:// > www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/F26><http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/F26%3e> Ah, I see that later updates for this technique actually corrected it to be about instructions, rather than use of icons/glyphs. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/failures/F26 P -- Patrick H. Lauke * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ * https://github.com/patrickhlauke * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke Madeleine Rothberg Senior Subject Matter Expert +1 (617) 300-2492
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2024 16:25:07 UTC