- From: Michael Livesey <mike.j.livesey@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:01:24 +0100
- To: Ms J <ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 07:01:29 UTC
I completely agree with your sentiments, it has been a source of frustration to me that WCAG is so heavily biased towards keyboard only users (e.g. focus visible) and screen readers. There are articles about the "Myth of the Keyboard Only User". I would like to see more emphasis in 3.0 on pointer device accessible users and those with cognitive impairments, which make up the vast majority of accessible users. Framing the above in normative, legally binding, criteria is difficult. Clearly some icons are more universally recognisable than others, but there would be a large grey area. On Tuesday, June 18, 2024, Ms J <ms.jflz.woop@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael > > The issue for an AT user would be a VA user who did not know how to reference the control by name as they wouldn't know how to refer to it. > There are some WCAG issues which impact all users but are more problematic for certain users. For example - headings and labels being non-descriptive. So, the fact it impacts all users doesn't necessarily mean it isn't an accessibility issue? > Thanks > Sarah > Sent from Outlook for iOS
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 07:01:29 UTC