- From: Milan Regec <milan.regec@hey.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:12:43 +0200
- To: IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <09d5021bae0f18f2d67524182752650c49dcb895@hey.com>
Hi, I am not exactly sure what you have in mind and what would be the purpose of such websites, but the list of common failures contains both examples of failures as well as detailed explanation about the reason of failing success criteria. I know it is a rather lengthy and technical reading, but it helps put some things into perspective (even though I do hope this section will receive a much needed update, as some parts feel rather old already, but still very relevant). https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/#failures Milan On May 21, 2024, Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Is there a website (or set) with a known set of issues mapped to all > the WCAG 2.2 Success Criteria? > > > > In other words, “this set of pages demonstrates failures for all the > WCAG Success Criteria”. > > > > There is that decades old Before After demo website > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/Overview.html> created by W3C that > was an initial attempt to do something like that. However, it is > woefully out of date. > > I’ve head that there may be some web pages maintained by a university > or organization for spot testing or spot demos, but a curated list > would be very helpful for the community. > > > > _______ > > Regards, > > > > Phill Jenkins > > IBM Accessibility, IBM Design > > Equal Access toolkit and accessibility checker at ibm.com/able/ > <https://www.ibm.com/able/> > > “Without accessibility, there is no diversity, equity, or inclusion > for disabled people” > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2024 14:12:47 UTC