- From: Marc Haunschild <marc.haunschild@accessibility.consulting>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 16:04:31 +0200
- To: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3F2D6EAF-CDF3-4FBB-AA26-6874102F8499@accessibility.consulting>
Hi Karen, WCAG does not demand progressive enhancement. It’s not important how you meet a success criterion. You can use native interactive HTML elements (like buttons or links) elements or a div and use complex techniques to make it behave like a button. In most cases it makes more sense to use a working wheel instead of reinventing it… Also WCAg is not only for blind people. If you get information, that obviously wrong, try to read the guideline yourself. It’s not really a lot of text, but sometimes hard to understand. The understanding documents can help. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Marc Haunschild - he / him - #gernPerDu Qualifizierte und autorisierte Prüfstelle im BIK-BITV-Prüfverbund Marc Haunschild Accessibility Consulting Sonnenhof 32 53119 Bonn Telefon: 0170 8 64 00 63 Web: https://Accessibility.Consulting https://haunschild.de Email: Marc.Haunschild@Accessibility.Consulting > Am 07.05.2024 um 15:35 schrieb Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>: > > Hi all, > I am hoping that there is a link to well anything, guidance material for example, that provides wisdom around progressive enhancement design. > how, as I understand it, working from this foundation creates broader access, can, in theory, get one closer to wcag compliance? > I am encountering far too many folks who either believe that wcag only applies to sight loss, or that it *mandates* certain tools must be used legally...and some of that comes from the u. s. state department. > Thanks, > Karen > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2024 14:04:50 UTC