- From: Adam Cooper <cooperad@bigpond.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:19:38 +1100
- To: "'Steve Green'" <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk>, "'P A F'" <pafalways@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Juliette McShane Alexandria'" <mcshanejuliette@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001a01da8615$052c3770$0f84a650$@bigpond.com>
That’s why the sort control should programmatically be a button because it performs an action rather than navigates. not all hyperlinks cause or should cause a reload (e.g., skip to or back to top). the reload behaviour when activating a sort control is exactly what is NOT expected regardless of how it is implemented. It is the operational efficiency of the view that is not preserved when focus becomes indeterminate/returned to the document … just like not managing focus when a dialog is displayed or when items are removed from a list etc. From: Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 7:10 PM To: P A F <pafalways@gmail.com> Cc: Juliette McShane Alexandria <mcshanejuliette@gmail.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: Sortable Table Focus Order SC 2.4.3 doesn’t apply if the page reloads. The behaviour is exactly what you would expect after operating a link. It’s not as good as updating the table without reloading the page, but it’s an inconvenience rather than a blocker and it sounds pretty insignificant if a user is only likely to change the sort order once or twice. Most websites have got much worse accessibility issues than this. Steve From: P A F <pafalways@gmail.com <mailto:pafalways@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 9:03 AM To: Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk <mailto:steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> > Cc: Juliette McShane Alexandria <mcshanejuliette@gmail.com <mailto:mcshanejuliette@gmail.com> >; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Subject: Re: Sortable Table Focus Order The interactive element is a link. So, I did not speak of 3.2.2. The closest SC I thought applied was 2.4.3. I was looking at the operability part of that SC. Could it be OK in terms of WCAG but not great for the user? P A F On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:22 AM Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk <mailto:steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> > wrote: SC 3.2.2, On Input only applies when changing the setting of a user interface component. It does not apply when buttons or links are operated. The initial post does not say what the “interactive sort element” is. If it’s a button in each column header, SC 3.3.2 will not apply. If it’s a combobox or set of radio buttons, SC 3.3.2 would apply if the page reload is caused by a change in the setting. It would not apply if the new setting is applied by operating a button. Steve Green Managing Director Test Partners Ltd From: Juliette McShane Alexandria <mcshanejuliette@gmail.com <mailto:mcshanejuliette@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 5:29 PM To: P A F <pafalways@gmail.com <mailto:pafalways@gmail.com> >; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Subject: Re: Sortable Table Focus Order Hi there, That sounds like an issue under 3.2.2, On Input <https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/on-input.html> . What you are describing is considered a 'change of context <https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/on-input.html#dfn-changes-of-context> '. The solutions here are to adjust the behavior of the component so it does not reload the page or to provide a warning before users encounter the controls that interacting with them will refresh the page. Hope this helps! Best, Juliette On 4/2/2024 9:26:10 AM, P A F <pafalways@gmail.com <mailto:pafalways@gmail.com> > wrote: Hello, I'm using a sortable table. If I activate an interactive sort element, the webpage refreshes and my focus is at the beginning of the webpage. I'll need to renavigate the content I've seen. Does it go against 2.4.3 Focus Order? Is meaning and operability preserved? P A F <https://tracking.getmailbird.com/OpenTrackingPixel/?messageId=Mailbird-e9d2ccd5-bad7-4c72-a3ab-a324a6d1794c@gmail.com&senderHash=2DB0E4908157CA5D6C96F6C2D4B878796FB4B77AD6F800A29FA96C2443A5CE7E&recipientHash=8CE2878435A94840519674171B0BA1DF87BC45254CDBDF5F842E692D8A284FAD&internalId=18f6b8cc-e618-412f-b1fd-7423a7f07c6a>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2024 22:19:46 UTC