- From: Kiran <kiranph@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:52:07 -0600
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGNehNVi1d77d++DT_TMYiu8sxC8cJBNa=PTnuzHtN9kd6FM0g@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you all for your reply. much appreciated. On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 1:07 PM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/03/2023 13:12, David Woolley wrote: > > On 08/03/2023 12:33, richard userite wrote: > >> absolute measurements such as pixels > > > > As I understand it, pixel long ago ceased to mean pixel and now means > > 1/96th of an inch. > > > >> proportional sizes such as "%" or "pt" > > > > "pt" is, as far as I know, still a typographer's point, which is as > > absolute as "px", but using 72, rather than 96, as the divisor. Did you > > mean "em"? > > > > Fun side note that if you're working in digital, all the various > measurements that match real-world units ("mm", "cm", "pt", etc) are > actually, by definition in the CSS spec, all anchored on the ideal pixel > definition, so have nothing to do with their traditional/real-world > counterparts (i.e. if you define something in "pt", or "mm", and then > hold a ruler against your screen, the results will vary wildly from > their real-world equivalents...) > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 23:52:31 UTC