- From: Kiran <kiranph@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:52:07 -0600
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGNehNVi1d77d++DT_TMYiu8sxC8cJBNa=PTnuzHtN9kd6FM0g@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you all for your reply. much appreciated.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 1:07 PM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:
> On 08/03/2023 13:12, David Woolley wrote:
> > On 08/03/2023 12:33, richard userite wrote:
> >> absolute measurements such as pixels
> >
> > As I understand it, pixel long ago ceased to mean pixel and now means
> > 1/96th of an inch.
> >
> >> proportional sizes such as "%" or "pt"
> >
> > "pt" is, as far as I know, still a typographer's point, which is as
> > absolute as "px", but using 72, rather than 96, as the divisor. Did you
> > mean "em"?
> >
>
> Fun side note that if you're working in digital, all the various
> measurements that match real-world units ("mm", "cm", "pt", etc) are
> actually, by definition in the CSS spec, all anchored on the ideal pixel
> definition, so have nothing to do with their traditional/real-world
> counterparts (i.e. if you define something in "pt", or "mm", and then
> hold a ruler against your screen, the results will vary wildly from
> their real-world equivalents...)
>
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 23:52:31 UTC