- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:02:35 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Cc: wai-eo-editors@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7962942F.04F17348-ON00258765.00771F07-86258765.00791662@ibm.com>
Some are interpreting the guidance on the W3C Web Accessibility Tutorial that a summary is required to meet WCAG for *complex* data tables. Is that the intent? In other words, should a checker, if it can detect a table is complex, check for a summary? The confusion is with the phrasing "is usually only needed" as meaning "required". Is it always required for complex tables, or only sometimes, and so could be a AAA Success Criteria? Either way, the WCAG 2.1 spec, Tutorial, techniques, and Understanding should be more explicit, hence I'm copying the editors. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/tables/caption-summary/ "... A summary is usually only needed for complex tables." Understanding 1.3.1 Info and Relationships is mute on the subject of complex tables. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/info-and-relationships.html Techniques listed do not address summary for complex data tables https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/?showtechniques=131#info-and-relationships p.s. I'm not talking about 'summary' that was deprecated in HTML 5. ___________ Regards, Phill Jenkins See the new IBM Equal Access toolkit and accessibility checker at www.ibm.com/able pjenkins@us.ibm.com Accessibility Executive IBM Accessibility linkedin.com/in/philljenkins/ www.ibm.com/able ageandability.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2021 03:26:23 UTC