- From: Guy Hickling <guy.hickling@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 22:49:28 +0100
- To: WAI Interest Group discussion list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAcXHNJGoGvLWbKCX-7c9dyqcLfstZ6aT1rF++LgzHjnpWapZg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Chaals, I've been a bit slow replying to your comment, so my apologies. How about the following to make the alt text both more concise and hopefully more readable: "Diagram of a fictitious university degree credential. It shows a Credential component on top, connected, via a proof, to a Signature component on the bottom. The top component has data identifying the issuing university, the type of credential and date and time of issue, and details of the alumni person holding the university's credential. The bottom Signature component holds a type of "RsaSignature2018", a timestamp, the university's public key, and a signature code and nonce." That isn't a lot shorter than the existing alt text, and I'm sure it could still be improved. But it is hopefully more readable and easier to understand, and conveys the two part structure. And it still allows people to do what I did when I first saw your diagram - I had to look at the names of the properties to work out what the diagram as a whole was saying. So it is important to list all the names (but as you say, not necessarily their values), so other people can do that. But as someone pointed out earlier, it would be even better to show this description visibly on screen, for all users who might prefer it to this rather complex diagram, rather than as an alt text just for screen reader users. I think all diagrams as complex as this, and more so, should just have the few words for the alt text and give the detailed description as text for all users. Lots of people don't find diagrams of this sort very helpful. Oh, and thank for explaining that graph bit! Regards, Guy
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2021 21:50:53 UTC