- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:39:30 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 11/01/2021 16:31, Bristow, Alan wrote:
[...]
> My confusion and reason for seeking advice is that the first example I
> link to above ('Mars and Venus') has TDs that are described by three
> THs. For example, the TD
> 50,000
> relates to; 'Teddy Bears', 'Produced', and 'Mars'. That TABLE has no
> HEADERs and IDs. However a TD being related to three THs seems to fit
> the description from the second link above, and so there appears to be
> an argument that IDs and HEADERs should be used. The two examples seem
> to contradict each other.
While true that that table has 3 THs relating to cells, that
relationship is purely baed on the horizontal/vertical association. so
it doesn't fulfill the page starter's "Such tables are too complex to
identify a strict horizontal or vertical association between header and
data cells."
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 11 January 2021 23:39:45 UTC