- From: Guy Hickling <guy.hickling@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 00:10:20 +0000
- To: WAI Interest Group discussion list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAcXHN+hQKVkHvVSR--khCdo2UNeBAn=Ktj-Tyb6hRPJK+Vi0Q@mail.gmail.com>
I agree with Steve's view. In fact I would go so far as to say that, with many websites, user testing before any remedial work has been done can be a complete waste of time and money. Because, very often, websites at that early stage in the game are completely unusable to disabled people. No good asking a screen reader user to test a website if all the pages have been created as single images and the tester cannot even find the content! (Yes, that does happen, though it is an extreme example!) There is also another factor. User testers can find what's wrong, but they can't tell you how to fix it. One huge benefit you get from an accessibility audit, if done by an expert professional, is that the consultant will tell you how to fix the defects they found, including what markup to use. Once you have fixed all the defects the audit found and had the recheck, bring in the user testers at that stage. They will find anything overlooked by the auditor, or that the developers might have unwittingly introduced along the way. Find testers with a wide range of impairments, using a range of assistive devices. Regards, Guy Hickling Accessibility Consultant
Received on Friday, 30 October 2020 00:10:45 UTC