- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 10:44:41 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 14/07/2020 08:44, Lars Ballieu Christensen wrote: > Referencing a specific version of the WCAG in legislation is usually a > bad idea as it would require an act of parliament or similar every time > the WCAG is updated. > UK law handles this by having two tiers of legislation. Acts are primary legislation, but this sort of detail is handled by secondary legislation, called statutory instruments. Secondary legislation can be either by negative resolution, in which case the elected representatives have to explicitly call for it to be rejected, or affirmative resolution, where the proposal is put to them in every case. The choice is specified in the primary legislation. This is an example of the secondary legislation for a code of practice in a different area: <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/518/made/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true> Note that, in the UK, one would expect WCAG to be handled in the same way as the above example, as something that can be used as one way of demonstrating compliance, rather than as something that must be followed to the letter. However, I don't believe it is currently referenced in UK law.
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2020 09:45:37 UTC