- From: caroline <woodward.caroline@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 18:29:16 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAberKE9opay5QVmYP1d3vx9ioa5q1Obvy8_8Jy01Mqpx5boyw@mail.gmail.com>
> > I actually regret mentioning that I'm trying to get our teams to create > one for our site because this tool is not like what im envisioning and my > point was that there is a danger to designers thinking that such a tool > will free them from having to include features that need and should be > there in the first place. 😊 > The scope of what I'm asking the team to create is small and manageable. A > switch to turn off animation and control for text size, contrast. That's > it. Again not from a third party but created by the very developers who > understand how things are knitted together. Nothing over the top. I hope > that puts some minds at ease. 😁 > > >> >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:30 PM caroline <woodward.caroline@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Steve i agree with you. I should clarify that I am not twisting arms for >>> the use of a third-party tool. Im asking for our teams to create some >>> switches of our own while stressing that it doesn't free us from ensuring >>> that accessibility is baked in. 😁 I have so many reservations around third >>> party tools and haven't seen any successfully execute to meet our needs. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020, 3:04 PM Steve Green < >>> steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> You need to be careful when making broad statements to the effect that >>>> the tool does not help achieve WCAG conformance (I appreciate that’s not >>>> quite what you were saying). For instance, WCAG SC 2.4.7 says “Any keyboard >>>> operable user interface has a mode of operation where the keyboard focus >>>> indicator is visible.” If the website does not have a focus indicator but >>>> the toolbar has a feature that adds one, then the success criterion is met. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In principle, the same applies to other success criteria, although this >>>> is dependent on the tool itself and its method identification and >>>> invocation being accessible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* caroline <woodward.caroline@gmail.com> >>>> *Sent:* 20 May 2020 19:47 >>>> *To:* Steve Green <steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> >>>> *Cc:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>>> *Subject:* Re: accessibility toolbar >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I wonder if they felt that having the toolbar would free them from >>>> having things like contrast baked in? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've been trying to twist the arms of folks to do this and some thought >>>> it meant they would be liberated from thinking about wcag and we're >>>> disappointed when I said no. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On another note that free shipping message sliding by at the top, has >>>> the odd effect of making me feel queasy. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020, 2:19 PM Steve Green < >>>> steve.green@testpartners.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> Also, the colour contrast of the focus indication in the toolbar >>>> violates SC 1.4.11. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There are actually some nice tools in there, like the screen ruler and >>>> screen mask, but some don’t always work properly, such as the controls for >>>> changing the text and background colours. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We and most of the rest of the accessibility community are generally >>>> opposed to tools like this, but at least it’s cheap compared with most >>>> others, so it’s not taking away much budget that could be better spent on >>>> other things. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Steve Green >>>> >>>> Managing Director >>>> >>>> Test Partners Ltd >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Annie Heckel <annieh@onlineada.com> >>>> *Sent:* 20 May 2020 19:01 >>>> *To:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>>> *Subject:* Re: accessibility toolbar >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Even without really investigating the toolbar much, I had to laugh when >>>> simply opening it caused the page to create a failure of WCAG 1.4.10: >>>> Reflow. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Annie H. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:40 AM Char Easter <ceaster@seattletimes.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Any thoughts on this accessibility toolbar? It appears on the site, >>>> https://farberwarecookware.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The tool is authored by, >>>> https://hikeorders.com/accessibility/main-accessibility-features/#accessibility-tools >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Char Easter* >>>> >>>> UX Designer at The Seattle Times >>>> >>>> p: 206.464.2945 >>>> >>>> e: ceaster@seattletimes.com >>>> >>>> m: 206.779.2427 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Annie Heckel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Lead Accessibility Auditor >>>> >>>> Online ADA <https://onlineada.com/> >>>> >>>>
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2020 22:29:43 UTC