- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:30:36 +0200
- To: Steve Lesslie <steve@lesslie.plus.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi Steve, Correct, the guidance in WCAG2ICT is informative. Yet EN 301 549 is a formal standard. Is there a reason not to follow that for conformance? Best, Shadi On 14/04/2020 14:44, Steve Lesslie wrote: > Hi, > > I would greatly appreciate advice about the appropriate conformance for > a project. > > The project involves an accessibility audit of a desktop software > application which runs on Windows and macOS (i.e. which has a native, > non-browser UI). > > There is an objective to demonstrate an obligation to accessibility > whilst taking into account conformance to the leading global > accessibility standards. The original intent is to achieve WCAG 2.1 > level AA. > > However, from the initial research I've done it seems more appropriate > for this project to demonstrate conformance to EN 301 549 - Section 11 > https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301500_301599/301549/02.01.02_60/en_301549v020102p.pdf > which is harmonized with WCAG2ICT. But my understanding, and apologies > if this is incorrect, is that WCAG2ICT is not a standard so conformance > does not apply hence using EN 301 549. > > Your views most welcome. > > Best regards > > Steve > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2020 16:30:46 UTC