Re: Table contrast ratio

Would the table be visually clear if the borders were completely 
removed? Or would it be very difficult to work out where one cell/row 
starts and another one ends?

If, with borders removed, the table becomes a confusing mess, then I'd 
say non-text contrast 3:1 should be applied. Basically, if the non-text 
"thing" is needed to understand visually what's going on, it should 
follow the ratio.

And saying "it's essential that the border be faint as otherwise it's 
too visually busy" (if I understand what you're trying to get at 
correctly) is not really what the "essential" clause is about.

In my view, anyway...

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2019 15:14:01 UTC