RE: Section 508 Auditing

Ø  There isn’t a standard format for a VPAT but all the ones I have seen are largely similar.


ITI owns the copyright on the VPAT report format.  This is the most common format used to create Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACRs).  The format can be used for reporting by anyone as long as you stick to the requirements listed in the VPAT template format.  The current version of VPAT2 is VPAT2.2

https://www.itic.org/policy/accessibility/vpat


Jonathan

Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
Level Access
jon.avila@levelaccess.com<mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
703.637.8957 office

Visit us online:
Website<http://www.levelaccess.com/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/LevelAccessA11y> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/LevelAccessA11y/> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/level-access> | Blog<http://www.levelaccess.com/blog/>

Looking to boost your accessibility knowledge? Check out our free webinars!<https://www.levelaccess.com/compliance-resources/webinars/>

The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

From: Steve Green [mailto:steve.green@testpartners.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 5:18 AM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Section 508 Auditing

I am not aware of any requirement for the auditor organization be a US company. We are a UK company and we have done Section 508 audits in the past, even when the testing requirements were different from WCAG.

A VPAT would be the obvious way to report the level of compliance. There isn’t a standard format for a VPAT but all the ones I have seen are largely similar. We took the best parts of everyone else’s to make ours – I’m happy to share it if that’s useful. There are lots on the web if you do a search, but be aware that VPATs are used for all sorts of ICT systems, not just web applications, so some will contain a lot of stuff you don’t need.

Steve Green
Managing Director
Test Partners Ltd


From: Batusic, Mario <mario.batusic@fabasoft.com>
Sent: 10 October 2018 09:17
To: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: AW: Section 508 Auditing

Hi Chaals,

Thanks a lot. That is not so nice from the US Gov that I have now to gues, who knos his job and hwo does’nt.

Still an other question: Must the auditor organization be an US Company to be accepted?

Mario

Von: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex.ru>>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 09:53
An: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>; Batusic, Mario <mario.batusic@fabasoft.com<mailto:mario.batusic@fabasoft.com>>
Betreff: Re: Section 508 Auditing

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:19:50 +0200, Batusic, Mario <mario.batusic@fabasoft.com<mailto:mario.batusic@fabasoft.com>> wrote:
Hello,

I have two questions:

  1.  Do I understand right the updated Section 508 from the year 2017 that adopts WCAG 2.0 A and AA as the measure for the accessibility of websites and web apps?


I think that is the gist of it. You should check of course.


  1.  What is the way for a company to successfully show, that its web app is accessible according to Section 508?
I think there is no Sect508 certificate available? Who should audit our web app so that the evaluation results are confident and accepted in USA?

Somebody who undestands what they are doing. I don't know that there is a list of "accepted suppliers", for certification, so you have to do your due diligence yourself.

It would be good if there were people who clearly used an agreed methodology and for whom you could get reviews.

As a quick start, anyone who uses an entirely automated process (with no human help) is unlikely to do a good evaluation, and anyone who doesn't use any tooling to look at your entire site might risk costing more money than necessary.

There are a number of accessibility companies that are W3C members partivipating in the work of *defining* WCAG. That doesn't prove they know what they are doing and that they do it well, but it is certainly a good sign, in my opinion. (There are also accessibility consultants who for one reason or other do not do that but are good...)

Sorry the answer is so vague. That's how it is...

cheers

Chaals


Thanks a lot in advance.

Mario




Mario Batusic
Accessibility Engineer

www.fabasoft.com<http://www.fabasoft.com/>

Tel.:              +43 732 606162-0
E-Mail:         mario.batusic@fabasoft.com<mailto:mario.batusic@fabasoft.com>


[cid:image002.png@01D33D3F.50086DC0]

Twitter<https://twitter.com/fabasoft> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/fabasoft/> | Google+<https://plus.google.com/+FabasoftCloud?hl=de> | YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/FabasoftCloud>

Fabasoft R&D GmbH, Honauerstraße 4
4020 Linz, Österreich | Handelsgericht Linz, FN 190091x


--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/