W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2018

RE: 2.1.1 vs 2.4.3

From: Sean Murphy (seanmmur) <seanmmur@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:07:37 +0000
To: Ramakrishnan Subramanian <ram.eict2013@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <93858e2c66d04a2487a61ee8be958ca8@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Hello,

It vilates 2.4.3 focus order. As the keyboard user cannot access the interactive element.  Screen Reader navigation is technology specific.



Sean Murphy
SR ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
seanmmur@cisco.com
Tel: +61 2 8446 7751

Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Forum 201 Pacific Highway
ST LEONARDS
2065
Australia
cisco.com

Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Ramakrishnan Subramanian <ram.eict2013@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, 13 August 2018 12:48 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: 2.1.1 vs 2.4.3

Dear Members,
I would like to get your opinion on the following scenario:
If an interactive element misses the tab-order, which criteria does it violate?
Example: A scripted button is not given (tabindex=”0”). Since a Keyboard only user cannot reach this with tab/shift tab key, does it violate (2.1.1)? or, since a Screen reader user can still reach it with quick navigation Key (B) and activate the Button, does it violate (2.4.3)?

Thanks and regards,
Ramakrishnan


-- 

Thanks and Regards
Ramakrishnan

Received on Monday, 13 August 2018 05:09:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:37:20 UTC