W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2017

(unknown charset) RE: Screen Readers | Rate = Words Per Minute

From: (unknown charset) Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 19:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: (unknown charset) "Sean Murphy (seanmmur)" <seanmmur@cisco.com>
cc: (unknown charset) "Wright, Isaiah" <Isaiah.Wright@ally.com>, WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1705091945060.1960@server2.shellworld.net>
Just as a contrast to the information below.
I use a  xerox reading edge as the synthesizer for all the screen readers 
on my  computer.
Because the unit is hardware also providing stand alone book reading, it 
has a control on its side that sets things as words per minute.  For 
example i am writing and reading e-mails  at 350 right now.
While I may be wrong I believe the words per minute may best  flow when the 
synthesizer providing the voice is  hardware not software.
I cannot speak for windows, I do not and have never used it.
Just sharing,
Karen


On Tue, 9 May 2017, Sean Murphy (seanmmur) wrote:

> All screen readers that I have used either use a percentage or a ranking from 1 to x. I have not seen any that gives you a word per minute.
>
> Sean Murphy
> Accessibility Software engineer
> seanmmur@cisco.com
> Tel: +61 2 8446 7751       Cisco Systems, Inc.
> The Forum 201 Pacific Highway
> ST LEONARDS
> 2065
> Australia
> cisco.com
> Think before you print.
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>
> From: Wright, Isaiah [mailto:Isaiah.Wright@ally.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 12:52 AM
> To: WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: Screen Readers | Rate = Words Per Minute
>
> I’m looking for examples of screen readers being used at different rates.
>
> I’ve read that experienced users often like to speed up the reading rate to 300 words per minute or more and that when many people hear a screen reader for the first time, at the normal rate of about 180 words per minute, they complain that it reads too quickly.
>
> I have access to NVDA but the rate is by percentage instead of words per minute. Is there a chart out there that translates rate percentage into words per minute?
>
> Cheers,
> Isaiah M. Wright
> Usability Research  | Integrated Channels & Experience
> 440 S. Church St., Charlotte NC 28202
> T + 704 444 4694  |  isaiah.wright@ally.com
> [image001.gif]
>
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2017 23:51:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 May 2017 23:51:27 UTC