- From: Gregg Vanderheiden RTF <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:34:21 +0200
- To: Kevin Meyers <kman2020@wi.rr.com>
- Cc: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>, Tobias Bengfort <tobias.bengfort@posteo.de>, IG - WAI Interest Group List list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9EF49F72-3FA0-4B67-BA0B-14B0A5AF20E3@raisingthefloor.org>
the w3c documents are all at www.w3.org/TR <http://www.w3.org/TR> WCAG 2.0 is https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20 <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20> WCAG 2.1 is https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/> 508 is on the Access Board site: AccessBoard.gov <http://accessboard.gov/> look for ICT access guidelines — a link to it is on the home page Gregg C Vanderheiden greggvan@umd.edu <mailto:greggvan@umd.edu> > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Kevin Meyers <kman2020@wi.rr.com <mailto:kman2020@wi.rr.com>> wrote: > > Léonie, I don't have an answer on your question. It is very unique you talk about WCAG20. I have been looking at getting into this type of work. I cannot find a class that teaches the 508 standards or W3C standards. Plus I cannot find documents for either one. I only find descriptions about these on the internet. Where did you gain your knowledge? Cheers, Kevin > > Kevin Meyers > I'm ready to rock, roll and race my tandem! > http://www.mytruevision.net <http://www.mytruevision.net/> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:14 PM > To: Tobias Bengfort; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: simple language subtag > > On 21/04/2017 18:42, Tobias Bengfort wrote: >> back in september 2015 I sent a message to this list asking about >> opinions on a "simple" language variant subtag. This would allow to >> provide a "version that does not require reading ability more advanced >> than the lower secondary education level" (WCAG20 3.1.5) like this: >> >> <link href="..." hreflang="en-simple" rel="alternate" /> >> >> In the meantime, this variant subtag has actually been registered[1] >> (not by me). >> >> Should the technique described above be included in the "How to Meet >> WCAG 2.0" document? Or should we wait for ATs to actually support this? >> If so, how can we push support in ATs? >> > Can you suggest which AT should be able to utilise this information and > in what way? As a piece of metadata that search engines could use to > return results with simplified content, I think there is a good use > case, but I'm not sure what screen reader, screen magnifier, or speech > recognition support might look like. > > > Léonie > -- > @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem > >> >> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.languages/11065 >> > >
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2017 13:34:57 UTC