W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Accessible websites

From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:23:50 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kiran Gundiyal Hemnani <kiranph@gmail.com>
cc: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1704081353070.5401@server2.shellworld.net>
Good afternoon Kiran,
Accessible by whom?
One of the most unique factors regarding the fantastic effort here, is the 
because there is likely as many ways to accommodate a body as there are 
people  seeking access,  your question may meet with rather a few answers.
If you mean, companies who take it upon themselves to incorporate access 
i. e. focused on fluid interaction, not necessarily adaptive tool, there are 
I was surprised you reference Apple, do you mean their on line store?
Do not mistake me, Apple may be the only major retailer that actually 
demonstrates accessible tools  on the spot in the store..
While Google often needs a spanking, they do have teams, take steps to 
keep some services accessible.
it might help your search too if you  indicate  accessible for what 
purpose as  one may find a door open for  some tasks, and closed for 
Care to be more specific?

On Sat, 8 Apr 2017, Kiran Gundiyal Hemnani wrote:

> Hey All,
> I am so glad that more and more people are getting aware about
> accessibility and implementing sites to be accessible.
> When we are saying Sites have become more accessible  are there any good
> well known sites would you recommend which are the BEST examples of
> accessible websites?
> Would you consider well known companies like Google,Apple to be the best
> accessible sites? If not what others sites -well known  if any? (like
> Webaim is good  example of accessble website..but it may not be very well
> known to common public and which also gets use mostly by more people)
> Appreciate your thoughts and suggestions for suggesting any good accessible
> websites which works and used by all.
> Thank you.Have a great weekend everyone.
> - Kiran
Received on Sunday, 9 April 2017 18:24:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 April 2017 18:24:19 UTC